Project Perfect Mod Forums
:: Home :: Get Hosted :: PPM FAQ :: Forum FAQ :: Privacy Policy :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Register :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in ::


The time now is Sat Apr 20, 2024 3:16 pm
All times are UTC + 0
Rants when C&C3 is involved
Moderators: Global Moderators, Offtopic Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [16 Posts] Mark the topic unread ::  View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Daz
Energy Commando


Joined: 26 Apr 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:55 pm    Post subject:   Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Why is that in every thread concerning C&C3 people feel the need to express their opinion on the game?

Can't people who aren't interested in or dislike the game stay out of the threads about it, the rest of us don't care. It was all over forums before the game came out, it was all over forums when the game came out and it's all over forums every time there's an update of some sort about the game. We don't need to hear about it on a regular basis.
Especially the people who feel the need to bitch about every single little thing that EA does - Westwood is dead, they're not coming back and C&C is EA's to do whatever they like with. Deal with it.

I think the moderators of the various community forums need to get tougher on this, it's completely inane discussion the majority of the time and quite often not relevant to the specific topic of the thread.

It's an absolute joke and I've not seen a single attempt by staff of any forum to stop it.

(This is no way applies to just this thread or just this forum, it's a regular occurrence in many places)

_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Clarkson
General


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Location: DAS BOOT IM DER OSTSEE

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thank you, Daz. This is the exact thing I cant stand, Every C&C3 thread results in Westwood's name coming up here. Godforbid you defend EA from the horde, then you get flamed and they whine to moderators because, you're supporting a moderate view of EA other then the 'KILL KILL EA!!!11' view. Where'd fairness and balance go? it seems voicing a view of EA other then absolute hatred, and considering TibSun any less then God's gift is an evil view.

_________________
PPM's Reichstrollfuherer, 236th Trollenparties brigade.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account AIM Address
Styledatol
Flamethrower


Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I know I said I hate EA, and I will probably hate them till the day I die.
Whether it's an attempt to save their own skin, or actually caring, I don't care.
EA is attempting to fix their screw up and bridge TS with TW.
I guess I'll give the expansion a try.
...and since The Hovercrafts and Cyborgs are coming back... I'll be waiting for the expansion.


Edit: On a side note, anyone playing the Settlers Beta?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account
GeckoYamori
Cyborg Artillery


Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

The constant crucification of EALA no matter what they do while elevating Westwood to a saint-like status in spite of their own shortcomings is so hopelessly naive and immature, it almost makes me feel like a pedohpile browsing these forums.

It's already been proven by Petroglyph staff that the original team were planning design decisions that a lot of fans wouldn't agree with. Things like moving away from mechs, toning down the apocalyptic atmosphere, etc, pretty much some of the core things people appreciated about TS. There were also multiple expansions planned, and now EALA has hinted towards it as well. Wether people would still complain or not about these things if Westwood still existed I don't know, but I'm leaning towards the former. It seems to generally be within a fan community's nature to bitch, bitch, bitch about the slightest deviation.
I don't know exactly what compels people to enjoy doing this so much, though I'm guessing it has something to do with the grass always being greener on the other side.

_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Von Kriplespac
General


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

GeckoYamori wrote:
The constant crucification of EALA no matter what they do while elevating Westwood to a saint-like status in spite of their own shortcomings is so hopelessly naive and immature, it almost makes me feel like a pedohpile browsing these forums.

It's already been proven by Petroglyph staff that the original team were planning design decisions that a lot of fans wouldn't agree with. Things like moving away from mechs, toning down the apocalyptic atmosphere, etc, pretty much some of the core things people appreciated about TS. There were also multiple expansions planned, and now EALA has hinted towards it as well. Wether people would still complain or not about these things if Westwood still existed I don't know, but I'm leaning towards the former. It seems to generally be within a fan community's nature to bitch, bitch, bitch about the slightest deviation.
I don't know exactly what compels people to enjoy doing this so much, though I'm guessing it has something to do with the grass always being greener on the other side.


Dude, you read my mind. Exactly what I was planning to say. <3

_________________
...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orald
Vehicle Driver


Joined: 08 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Carnotaurus wrote:
it seems
...
considering TibSun any less then God's gift is an evil view.

Well, that's actually right. TS IS God's gift to mankind. Smile

That using mechs or equiping them with the same old cannon as with any tank is inefficient is another matter, not to mention making a big expensive mech from a trivial artillary unit which has no need for great manuverabilty or what was it that mechs are supposed to provide over tanks(talking about Juggernaut). Razz

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clarkson
General


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Location: DAS BOOT IM DER OSTSEE

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Umm, what the hell did you just say?

_________________
PPM's Reichstrollfuherer, 236th Trollenparties brigade.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account AIM Address
CCHyper
Defense Minister


Joined: 07 Apr 2005

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

lol... very true though Daz...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muldrake
Supreme Commander


Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Location: England

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I've split this from the original topic, because it was going away from the original point. However, Daz brings up a very good point, one which I feel was also brought up partly from Sonic at CNCNZ.

I guess its up to Banshee about how it is treated at PPM, but it is something I'm noticing a bit about, and something I have admittedly been prone to in the past.

EA is a company just like any other company, they'll work the numbers. And the numbers between TD and TS to them showed that TS was going in the wrong direction. They have to make a profit. And the bigger the profit, the more the chance they'll work on the series/project in the future.

_________________
If there is a problem on the forums, PM me.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Daz
Energy Commando


Joined: 26 Apr 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Ha, Apoc's done a good job replying there. He's got his work cut out for him but he seems to be handling it well.

That thread's worth reading actually, it's got the one piece of info that alot of people seem to miss.
TS wasn't very good and, more importantly, wasn't very successful. Using too much from TS to appeal to a relatively tiny demographic would've been business suicide.

_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Muldrake
Supreme Commander


Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Location: England

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Yeah, exactly.
Although now, with TW's success, they can afford to give a little more to the "hard-core" TS fans, without throwing out all the pre-established stuff which has worked for the majority of players in TW. They can also, potentially experiment a bit more with ideas, suggestions and features, because they won't be relying on it so much for the money (well, not as much as C&C3 itself) and it won't cost so much to produce also.

Like I've said, expansion packs in the past have always improved the original game, its been seen with TS+FS, RA2+YR, Generals+ZH. (I can't speak for the addons to TD and RA as I never tried them.)
And for the EA bashers, all of the expansions I've mentioned were under the power of EA, so..

_________________
If there is a problem on the forums, PM me.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CCHyper
Defense Minister


Joined: 07 Apr 2005

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I am really getting tired of the WW vs EA crap, i know there are lots of differences and stuff from WW ideas etc , but really... its C&C... i love it, i enjoy it, is that not enough?. I was ecstatically happy when EA decided to continue the C&C series whatever it could have been, more C&C the better Very Happy...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Daz
Energy Commando


Joined: 26 Apr 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Muldrake wrote:
Yeah, exactly.
Although now, with TW's success, they can afford to give a little more to the "hard-core" TS fans, without throwing out all the pre-established stuff which has worked for the majority of players in TW.


Which is where the story explaining expansion quite nicely slides into place (or will if they fix the naff looking units like the helicopter with blades which slice through each other and the hovering saucer railgun tank).

As for addons to TD/RA they were generally a bit naff.
Covert Ops (TD) adding some new missions and I presume some new maps, but I don't remember any new units.
Counterstrike (RA) did the same plus some mission specific new units (Tesla Tank mission for example) but none for multiplay.

Aftermath (RA) had new missions, new maps and a few new units. So it was decent but gave the Soviets an even bigger advantage by countering the Allied cruiser, which was basically all the Allies had going for them.

_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Crash
Cyborg Commando


Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I only comment on it because someone else come with a smartass comment #Tongue

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaFool
Defense Minister


Joined: 07 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I think that the fact that Command and Conquer games are so easy to mod has caused it to be hated by so many. Now that people have the ability to create they beleive they can do better than the original creators, and from that believe only their views are the only good ones.

Look at starcraft, compare the amount of starcraft mods to any one command and conquer game. Which game has the more hardcore fans? Are there more people playing starcraft right now or red alert, yuri's revenge, tibsun, and firestorm combined? Blizzard actually gave the fans less yet they are loved even more. Plus SC has only one expansion, and not a single thing since (well the sequle is coming out, but only after all this time)

If you don't see where I'm going it is this: people get angry because CnC isn't coinciding with their views anymore. There are mech vs tank people, ea vs ww people, and I'm sure there are a bunch of other little controversities. The arguement bassically comes down to conservatism vs progress.

Sure TD was the greatest game when it first came out, but if games as a whole wants to survive, they always has to keep trying new things and evolving. Sure you may not like what they try out all the time, but eventually they are gonna get something right. It's not like absolutly no one bought CnC3. And the thousands of fans who really love the game, aren't wasting their time putting it down or defending it, they're doing what they are suppose to, playing it Wink

EDIT:spelling/grammar

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sir Modsalot
Commander


Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Location: Mixing psilocybin in your drinks.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

TSHyper wrote:
I am really getting tired of the WW vs EA crap, i know there are lots of differences and stuff from WW ideas etc , but really... its C&C... i love it, i enjoy it, is that not enough?. I was ecstatically happy when EA decided to continue the C&C series whatever it could have been, more C&C the better Very Happy...


Exactly how I see it, as well.

_________________


[quote="DCoder"]There is no sanity left in this thread.[/quote]

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [16 Posts] Mark the topic unread ::  View previous topic :: View next topic
 
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on DiggShare on RedditShare on PInterestShare on Del.icio.usShare on Stumble Upon
Quick Reply
Username:


If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise answer the challenges below please contact the Administrator for help.


Write only two of the following words separated by a sharp: Brotherhood, unity, peace! 

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

[ Time: 0.1584s ][ Queries: 11 (0.0081s) ][ Debug on ]