Project Perfect Mod Forums
:: Home :: Get Hosted :: PPM FAQ :: Forum FAQ :: Privacy Policy :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Register :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in ::


The time now is Tue Jun 16, 2026 9:34 pm
All times are UTC + 0
IVI SPHAFV-5 Lancer Mk.II
Moderators: Global Moderators, Media Hut Moderators, Red Alert 2 Moderators, Tiberian Sun Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [18 Posts] Mark the topic unread ::  View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
IVI
Commander


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Location: Feilubin

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:31 pm    Post subject:  IVI SPHAFV-5 Lancer Mk.II
Subject description: rehash of an old model
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

The IVI SPHAFV-5 Lancer has been upgraded with a more spacious turret, a more powerful mass driver, and a new weapon system.

The Lancer had always experienced trouble when faced with armor. Its mass driver used to propel HE shells only, which aren't very effective against ceramic armored tanks and IFVs. Lancer pilots often just outmaneouvred heavy armor to avoid them.

The new PWN rocket launcher outfitted with the upgraded version is the Lancer pilot's new bestfriend when dealing with heavy armor.



IVI Lancer Armored Cavalry.PNG
 Description:
 Filesize:  21.64 KB
 Viewed:  3860 Time(s)

IVI Lancer Armored Cavalry.PNG



Lancer1.PNG
 Description:
 Filesize:  135.09 KB
 Viewed:  3860 Time(s)

Lancer1.PNG



Lancer2.PNG
 Description:
 Filesize:  125.46 KB
 Viewed:  3860 Time(s)

Lancer2.PNG



Lancer3.PNG
 Description:
 Filesize:  142.43 KB
 Viewed:  3860 Time(s)

Lancer3.PNG



_________________
"War.... war never changes....."

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team Black
Defense Minister


Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Location: Teamblackistan Posts: Over 9000

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Nice work on this, has a convincing looking hover body.

Corsair would probably scold you though, as he believes cannons - especially on turrets - on hover-chassis would make too much recoil for them to be practical #Tongue

_________________
The Fall of Hammerfest - Epic Tiberian chain story

Tiberian Odyssey mapping department. Discord
The Team Black Index

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lin Kuei Ominae
Seth


Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

A cool tank you've there, however a bit too colorful for my taste.

btw, funny tiberium. Laughing

_________________
SHP Artist of Twisted Insurrection:  Nod buildings

Public SHPs
X-Mech Calendar (28 Mechs for GDI and Nod)
5 GDI, 5 Nod, 1 Mutant, 1 Scrin unit, 1 GDI building

Tools
Image Shaper______TMP Shop______C&C Executable Modifier

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lt Albrecht
Defense Minister


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, England. Creating RA2: Moscow's vengeance

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

That's actually quite cool Cool
And theoretically you could have a cannon on a hover vehicle if you have something to counteract the cannon's recoil or a particularly effective recoil mechanism.

_________________
Yes, work on MV continues. It is not forgotten.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account
gufu
Defense Minister


Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Location: Tiberium Research Center N27

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Heh... PWN indeed.

_________________
DUNK!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account
IVI
Commander


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Location: Feilubin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks for the feedback Smile .

But correct me if I'm wrong but Mass Drivers ought to have much much less recoil accelerating projectiles as opposed to conventional Primer+warhead weapons would it not?

At Lin,

yeah hehe Very Happy . I should've finished all aspects of the junk-resource aeons ago but somebody whip me... I've been attacked by laziness o_O. j/k

_________________
"War.... war never changes....."

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaFool
Defense Minister


Joined: 07 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

How many voxels have you made?

The tank looks good, although I would've went with a more solid colour scheme.

_________________
Please, read the signature rules of the forum.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Judeau
Commander


Joined: 28 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

IVI wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Smile .

But correct me if I'm wrong but Mass Drivers ought to have much much less recoil accelerating projectiles as opposed to conventional Primer+warhead weapons would it not?



not....really
simple laws of physics still hold ( action = -reaction )
so to fire a projectile at a certain speed in either acceleration system would be very close, the only possible extra source of recoil in conventional tank weaponry is when the shell leaves the barrel, and the pressure behind it pushes against the air, instead of against the shell.

_________________
Micro TS
Portable, no campaign, movies or music, just the engine and needed resources for skirmish and lan.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account
Lin Kuei Ominae
Seth


Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

but while for a conventional cannon, the whole recoil energy is unleashed at a very short time,
a mass driver propels the projectile over several (milli)seconds, what gives a hovercraft enough time to steer in the opposite direction and correct the recoil.

_________________
SHP Artist of Twisted Insurrection:  Nod buildings

Public SHPs
X-Mech Calendar (28 Mechs for GDI and Nod)
5 GDI, 5 Nod, 1 Mutant, 1 Scrin unit, 1 GDI building

Tools
Image Shaper______TMP Shop______C&C Executable Modifier

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IVI
Commander


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Location: Feilubin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I've always thought that mass drivers were supposed to accelerate a projectile by means of synchronized attraction/repulsion by a series of coils. I can't really place the third law on that situation.

_________________
"War.... war never changes....."

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaFool
Defense Minister


Joined: 07 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

who says the barrel of the cannon can't be suspended in the air via magnets? It would never touch the tank, so it wouldn't be rocked with it (although controlling the barrel could be a problem, but in the future, everything is taken care of).

_________________
Please, read the signature rules of the forum.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
4StarGeneral
General


Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Location: Limbo

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

If the barrel was suspended in air with magnets, the barrel would most likely shoot out the back of the turret, or if there was a magnet behind that to stop it, it would repel it shooting forward.
EDIT: Unless they're perfectly balanced, heavy duty, electromagnets.

LKO has the best possible theory, if it already has a propulsion system since it is floating, why can they not have countermeasures built into the main computer that shoot the tank forward milliseconds before the shot? I would think it easy if they got the "hovering" thing down so well. #Tongue

Physics 101 anyone? Very Happy

Anyways, tank looks great as always, though I think we're beginning to take your great voxel art for granted IVI. Cool

_________________
"Don't beg for things; Do it yourself or you'll never get anything."

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail YouTube User URL
partyzanPaulZy
Commander


Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Location: laptop? ... otherwise the Czech Republic -> south Moravia Posts: long int Posts;

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

There's also electric lifter (30000V on small triangle), but it should require mobile fusion plant and it 'll be pretty dangerous not only to the enemy...

The best is simple hovering...

_________________

Don't blame the others if you haven't checked your own (in)ability in the first case.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaFool
Defense Minister


Joined: 07 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I know there is a bow and arrow set that instead od having the arrow rest on the bow, there is a magnetic ring that holds it suspended in air, thus allowing for you to launch it without making a noise.

Or since i like magnets, why not have the cannon be magnetic propulsion so it does not have back fire at all?

_________________
Please, read the signature rules of the forum.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lt Albrecht
Defense Minister


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, England. Creating RA2: Moscow's vengeance

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

umm, we already discussed that and physics 101 still stands every action has an equal and opposite counteraction.

Thank god for that apple...

_________________
Yes, work on MV continues. It is not forgotten.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account
Apex
General


Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Location: Final Alert 2

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

What about a tube that runs out the back of the turret allowing the pressure of the shot to be vented back.

_________________
Comcast: Yo dawg we herd yo were downloading, so we put fail in yo modem so yo cant download while yo failin!

Last edited by Apex on Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:15 pm; edited 1 time in total

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account Yahoo Messenger Account
IVI
Commander


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Location: Feilubin

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Look, I'll post the drawing I made for this last year to show what I mean #Tongue (and the wolverine drawing I made that I forgot to submit).

1.)The turret assembly is just like that of a modern tank, i.e. the barrel is fixed to the turret (no magnetic suspensions or anything).

2.)

a.)The principle of these fictional mass drivers is that an on-board microfusion reactor provides power to a series of magnets to propel a projectile by use of magnetic coils.

b.)For those who have studied physics, we know that a current through a wire will induce a magnetic field about the said wire. I fictionalize that the mass drivers that I describe these units to have are a series of solenoids. A strong current is passed simultaneously through the series of solenoids to generate a strong magnetic field in order to accelerate a projectile to speeds that will maximize the kinetic energy equation. (note that APFSDS rounds are built around the kinetic energy equation).

_________________
"War.... war never changes....."

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lt Albrecht
Defense Minister


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Location: Hampshire, England. Creating RA2: Moscow's vengeance

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

yes, and in doing so the mass driver will create a recoil... Although a slight one, but serious for something that floats.

_________________
Yes, work on MV continues. It is not forgotten.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [18 Posts] Mark the topic unread ::  View previous topic :: View next topic
 
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on DiggShare on RedditShare on PInterestShare on Del.icio.usShare on Stumble Upon
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

[ Time: 0.2683s ][ Queries: 17 (0.0158s) ][ Debug on ]