Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:37 pm Post subject:
Why Generals sucks...
Subject description: Not why you think it did...
It's time we all face it, Generals sucked. EA tried at a real game, but really failed, since the story was completely not like what it should be. (come on, US being the really good guys, no to terrorrism?, that's BRAINWASHING!)
Also, Generals was a promising game to me at first, guess why it failed? The gameplay mechanics and the graphics, and even the entire game was changed!
First, graphically, Generals was gonna turn out awesome, it was gonna be exactly what Act of War: Direct Action is now. It was gonna have Realistic water, water reflects, light reflects (not as advanced as in C&C3, but still good), Day-to-night cycles, smooth and realistic shadows that also moved depending on the time of the day, white aircraft trails (OMG!), anti-aliasing (yeah, they had it implemented later in development, but ended up removing it), destructible environments (eg you'd see the glass fall off a building when it was hit, but it would still have HP left). It was gonna be the next-gen RTS in 2003! EA just had to change their minds and make it uglier. Ugh...texture stretching for water is a big NO WAI. Good thing they're bringing back the graphics and gameplay mechanics back into C&C3, and this time, they better stay there, or I will never buy C&C3. An ugly and dark game with no reflections and in need of anti-aliasing in 2007 is not a game i'd buy. Look at IGN to see how the game was meant to look originally. The game looked fresh and good, now it looks ugly and dirty...
Finally, the sides looked quite promising. They changed the Khan side to a futuristic China, made the US more patriotic in design, and the GLA ended up looking less like "terrorists". It ended up turning all boring and close to reality, although without any Abram Tanks or even Paladin Artilleries! The skins on the vehicles also look very pimpish, while they should've been camouflage. I really dunno where the reality is now...The gameplay also was gonna be more fun than what it ended up being (boring that is, but not because of the Dozer and Worker system it used).
Why do we even have to complain anymore? I mean we can mod the game and make it like it should be (although there aren't many programers and Generals is non-OS). QUICK_EDIT
I think Generals sucks as a C&C game, but it is a good modern war game. It is Modern conflict with a C&C name slapped onto it. So, don't get mad at the game, get made at the "false" title. QUICK_EDIT
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum