Project Perfect Mod Forums
:: Home :: Get Hosted :: PPM FAQ :: Forum FAQ :: Privacy Policy :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Register :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in ::


The time now is Wed Apr 24, 2024 12:23 pm
All times are UTC + 0
political orientation anyone ?
Moderators: Global Moderators, Offtopic Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 [73 Posts] Mark the topic unread ::  View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
Judeau
Commander


Joined: 28 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:24 pm    Post subject:  political orientation anyone ? Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


_________________
Micro TS
Portable, no campaign, movies or music, just the engine and needed resources for skirmish and lan.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account
Von Kriplespac
General


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


_________________
...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oshog
General


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Clazzy
Karma Police


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Location: Algae Colony On Mars

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Here you go.

I'm personally an EXTREMELY liberal person, but my opinions towards criminals are a different matter and it reflects. If there were no questions about the death penalty and other things to do with the justice system, I'd be a lot more like this.

_________________
Quote:
This is sexier than what this forum was supposed to tolerate. - Banshee

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clarkson
General


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Location: DAS BOOT IM DER OSTSEE

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.46

_________________
PPM's Reichstrollfuherer, 236th Trollenparties brigade.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account AIM Address
Havoc
Commander


Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Pokey
Energy Commando


Joined: 29 May 2005
Location: England

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Economic Left/Right: -2.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

_________________


Organised Rules.ini by Judeau

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Banshee
Supreme Banshee


Also Known As: banshee_revora (Steam)
Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I used to tend to communism when I was younger. Today I hate comunism, although I hate neo-liberalism... so I expected me to be somewhat close to the center on both axis, as I usually defend freedom with responsability. I'm surprisingly more libertarian than what I expected.


Quote:
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -3.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.72



http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-3.25&soc=-4.72

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Skype Account
Suiseiseki
Commander


Joined: 06 Oct 2003

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Shoop Da Woop

(Really:
Economic Left/Right: -4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.21)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gufu
Defense Minister


Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Location: Tiberium Research Center N27

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Who am I?
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

_________________
DUNK!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account
Titan
Cyborg Commando


Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SMIFFGIG
General


Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: Great Britain

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account
IVI
Commander


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Location: Feilubin

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Economic Left/Right: -3.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.23

hmm, that made me think more about how I see myself Idea

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dreadlord
AA Infantry


Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Location: Russia, Voskresensk

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I remember a similar political test that shows person's political affliation in %. I was 100% Socialist and 100% Communist, but 66% Liberal Smile

This one was not an exception. According to this test, I am a communist, somewhere below comrade Stalin, i.e. I am a bit more liberal, but not liberal enough to cross the line that divides Authoritarian and Liberal stuff, so I am Authoritarian Very Happy ...

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05

http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-7.75&soc=2.05

_________________
Sealab 2021 wrote:
Marco: So you rigged the OFF button with a tear gas grenade? Ho ho ho, you magnificent bastard!
Sparks: Oh, that's nothin', man. The ON button is a 50-megaton hydrogen bomb.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ChielScape
General


Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Location: In ur BIOS, Steeln ur Megahurtz!

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

"Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.97"

_________________
Please, read the signature rules of the forum.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account
The DvD
TiberiumWeb.com Webmaster


Joined: 30 Dec 2002
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Skype Account
Havoc
Commander


Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Oh well, no one too far on the right at least Laughing.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clazzy
Karma Police


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Location: Algae Colony On Mars

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I've always seen left as "for the people" and right as "for the corporations". Unless people are CEOs of large companies, I would have expected most people to be left-wing. How anybody could be against being liberal is beyond me, though.

_________________
Quote:
This is sexier than what this forum was supposed to tolerate. - Banshee

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Easy. I want to make money, protect the values of society, limit the extent of government, help only who is savable, keep taxes low, and protect the proven rights already existing instead of making them up.

Abortion for one is a violation of the civil rights of the unborn CHILD. Do not pass Go, do not collect 200$. That and Science says "life begins at conception" not a second after.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clazzy
Karma Police


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Location: Algae Colony On Mars

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Oh, how naive.
Quote:
protect the values of society, limit the extent of government

You'll find that being more liberal is the way to go here. The government controls by involving themselves in the lives of people. They monitor and question the actions of their people and treat everybody as though they're a possible criminal than an innocent person.

Quote:
help only who is savable

Who cannot be saved? The poor? The mentally handicapped? The millions of homeless, AIDs-stricken people in Africa? Everybody can be helped in some form and it shouldn't just be a dog-eat-dog world. Humans naturally have compassion and sympathy, we shouldn't just throw it away for personal gain.

Quote:
keep taxes low, and protect the proven rights already existing instead of making them up.

I don't see how your political bias keeps taxes down, it would actually make them worse for individuals. A more left-wing government would tax larger corporations more than their population. Proven rights? Made-up rights? Elaborate.

Quote:
Abortion for one is a violation of the civil rights of the unborn CHILD. Do not pass Go, do not collect 200$. That and Science says "life begins at conception" not a second after.

There has to be a line drawn when it comes to rights. Life is life, be it a single cell or an entire creature. At the end of it myself, you, me and everybody else on this forum is about as important in the scheme of things as a piece of bacteria duplicating on my space bar. We simply deem ourselves more important because we can. An unborn child isn't sentient or a complete organism, we simply deem it to be because we say so. Life technically began beforehand when the sperm and the egg were created by the body. Would killing either of them count as killing the child? Would killing the creator of the egg/sperm be killing of a possible future child? I could pointlessly ramble like this for a while about most topics, really.

_________________
Quote:
This is sexier than what this forum was supposed to tolerate. - Banshee

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Treat everyone like criminals and you end up with violent Revolutions whether the populace was able to bear arms or not.

The savable are only those who are willing to try and help themselves. Most of those you mentioned would rather die than walk away from something as simple as a snake or storm or fire or away from disease/disaster/war/etc. Sorry to be heartless but there are probably more savable people in downtown Denver than the whole continent of Africa.

Proven rights are those that are already written down or explained. Examples include bearing arms in some countries, free speech, free religion, due process in criminal proceedings, freedom of movement, the right to dissent for a few. Made up ones are ones that only fit an ideologies belief rather than mankind such as abortion, lifelong welfare, disarmament and such. As for taxes, you try maintaining a stable and thriving economy when the providers are charged through their teeth with taxes. Take a good long hard look at much of Europe and you will see that point. Or if your lazy, Europe right now is in economic downturn while the US, China, India, Latin America are all on economic upturn. The main difference is taxes and government regulation. Even China has less than France and others implement and they are Communist.

According to Science an organism is complete the second its DNA is fully coded. Besides deeming the unborn to be second-rate to humans is exactly like the old Slaveowners mentality not one iota different.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IVI
Commander


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Location: Feilubin

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Clazzy wrote:


Quote:
help only who is savable

Who cannot be saved? The poor? The mentally handicapped? The millions of homeless, AIDs-stricken people in Africa? Everybody can be helped in some form and it shouldn't just be a dog-eat-dog world. Humans naturally have compassion and sympathy, we shouldn't just throw it away for personal gain.



That's a very noble and idealistic point of view. Maybe it's because you live in a comfortable 1st world country where your definition of poverty is actually the definition of middle class in other areas that you have the luxury of stating that. But if you try to live in a poverty stricken country like Cambodia or Indonesia or Somalia and your resources and chances are just about as equal as the people living there, well wether your views on life would change will have to be re-determined.

incurring my idealistic self, yes, I agree with you and one man should help another. But realistically, that just isn't the case with the world. Take a look around. the percentage of people who would actually care and provide for others is typically less than 10% (or even less). And don't forget that people already have affairs of their own and wouldn't care at all if other people were dying every second.

The truth of the matter is, it IS a dog-eat-dog world. whatever we do, it will remain that way. You might say that 'Oh come on, the world can't stay like this forever where there's the A-class and the B-class and the C,D,E classes' but the numbers are whitewashed. Those who fall in the category of 'needing help' multiply geometrically while those who are actually, genuinely wanting to help them hardly increase in number.

From what I've seen here in the Philippines, many of the poor are ingrates. You try to help 100 of them and 90 will keep asking for more (although a few here and there will learn from example and will actually strive to live a better life by actually working and getting a job). You give them more and that same 90 will start milking you for all you're worth and when you stop giving them aid by virtue of "You have to learn to stand on your own two feet eventually and stop depending on others" lesson, they'd bear grudges against you for 'abandoning' them and now you've got a dozen family grudges.

"We are the product of our own decisions". anyone can change his/her fate. Decades ago the filipino-chinese were spat upon, ridiculed and laughed at. But because they worked hard and resolved to succeed, they did and now they're better off than those who scoffed at them.

The way I see it, no one can really help you but yourself; no amount of outside help will raise you up if you don't actually do the stand yourself.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DeathRay2K
Commander


Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

[url=http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-4.75&soc=-6.00">Yay left![/url]

_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Skype Account
Crimsonum
Seth


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Location: Fineland

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

My political compass

Looks kinda...

Economic Left/Right: -4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.28

#Tongue

_________________


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clazzy
Karma Police


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Location: Algae Colony On Mars

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Quote:
Treat everyone like criminals and you end up with violent Revolutions whether the populace was able to bear arms or not.

Well the UK hasn't rebelled in the past 50 years. Our country can now arrest people for 30 days without trial, will take (and retain) fingerprint/DNA samples of you if you get arrested by the police, even if you are released without charge and our police force killed an innocent preson last year (I think it was then, anyway), thinking they were a terrorist. America has locked up people without trial in Guantanamo Bay and has successfully torn up whatever human and consitutional rights American people have.

Quote:
The savable are only those who are willing to try and help themselves. Most of those you mentioned would rather die than walk away from something as simple as a snake or storm or fire or away from disease/disaster/war/etc. Sorry to be heartless but there are probably more savable people in downtown Denver than the whole continent of Africa.

And you know this how? Have you actually been to Africa to find out about this?

Quote:
Proven rights are those that are already written down or explained. Examples include bearing arms in some countries, free speech, free religion, due process in criminal proceedings, freedom of movement, the right to dissent for a few. Made up ones are ones that only fit an ideologies belief rather than mankind such as abortion, lifelong welfare, disarmament and such. As for taxes, you try maintaining a stable and thriving economy when the providers are charged through their teeth with taxes. Take a good long hard look at much of Europe and you will see that point. Or if your lazy, Europe right now is in economic downturn while the US, China, India, Latin America are all on economic upturn. The main difference is taxes and government regulation. Even China has less than France and others implement and they are Communist.

Europe is NOT a country, every single country is separate. If you can't distinguish between a country and a continent then don't try and argue a case like that. Taxes in Britain are approximately the same as America and we currently have a stronger currency than you.

Quote:
According to Science an organism is complete the second its DNA is fully coded. Besides deeming the unborn to be second-rate to humans is exactly like the old Slaveowners mentality not one iota different.

But regardless, you have to draw a limit at what is life and what is not. If you consider a day-old human embryo to be life, surely a day-old cow embryo has the same rights?

Quote:
That's a very noble and idealistic point of view. Maybe it's because you live in a comfortable 1st world country where your definition of poverty is actually the definition of middle class in other areas that you have the luxury of stating that. But if you try to live in a poverty stricken country like Cambodia or Indonesia or Somalia and your resources and chances are just about as equal as the people living there, well wether your views on life would change will have to be re-determined.

incurring my idealistic self, yes, I agree with you and one man should help another. But realistically, that just isn't the case with the world. Take a look around. the percentage of people who would actually care and provide for others is typically less than 10% (or even less). And don't forget that people already have affairs of their own and wouldn't care at all if other people were dying every second.

Well you're right in some respect (poverty is relative), but I do try to help others in whatever way I can. I've donated to charities and everybody should, quite frankly. It was appalling when the tsunami hit in 2004 and Britain (population 60 million) had donated about twice as much as America (population 200 million), despite America crying for support with Katrina and 9/11. Americans (this is a terrible generalisation, I apologise to people who did donate) are so insular and don't care about the rest of the planet until something bad happens to them. People in Europe actually care about helping the rest of the world to some extent.

Quote:
The truth of the matter is, it IS a dog-eat-dog world. whatever we do, it will remain that way. You might say that 'Oh come on, the world can't stay like this forever where there's the A-class and the B-class and the C,D,E classes' but the numbers are whitewashed. Those who fall in the category of 'needing help' multiply geometrically while those who are actually, genuinely wanting to help them hardly increase in number.

That's because the rich want to be richer, that is how modern society works. If modern society collapsed, everybody would be in the same boat and everything could be started again. The core problems with this world nowadays come from one thing and one thing only:
Money.

Think about that for a moment, before money people lived together in communities and shared what they made. Farmers tended to the land, reared animals and fed people, clothmakers made clothes, blacksmiths would make tools for the other trades, miners would get coal, lumberjacks wood and so on and soforth. The group had to work together and a loss of an individual was a loss to everybody. When money came along, people then worked for their own gain to get as much money as possible. People stop caring about other people when they get wealth, simply put. Unfortunately, we can't just abolish money, but helping our fellow man is a good start to a fairer and better society.

_________________
Quote:
This is sexier than what this forum was supposed to tolerate. - Banshee

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Gitmo is different than the US constitution. For one Gitmo is MILITARY and the Constitution applies to CIVILIANS. (albeit it does have some tug on military issues) Combatants captured in the field are not granted civilian rights nor should they be.

Pay attention to whats happening over there. Has Africa actually improved in the last 20 years? If anything its gotten worse! Darfur for example NOBODY is even trying to escape the genocide. Not because they cant, but because they want someone to save them from it for them. Just like Katrina where nobody in the SuperDome was willing to simply walk out of the city and was waiting for someone to rescue them the people in Darfur and all of Africa are the same way. You cant help he who wont help himself. Tis a waste.

So it was a generalization but do you really think outside the UK, Europe has superior economy than anywhere in the world? Statistics say no.

Day old cow embryo has just the same right to be born as a 1 second old human embryo. Saying otherwise is discriminatory to the unborn since they cannot speak for themselves yet.

Calling us Americans stingy? Look whos been listening to Annan too much. By all statistics the United States donated THE most gross money to the relief effort and even sent soldiers to help people and evacuate injured in the 2004 Tsunami. Linky below that shows the US donated THE MOST.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanitarian_response_to_the_2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake#List_of_Donors

Communal living may have been there in the early days but you are forgetting one key thing. Standard of living. They had to do so since farming techniques and means of survival were so rudimentary that one-man subsistance was near impossible. Whereas money and modern economy created exponential quantities of food that primitive societies couldonly dream about, technology to create that, countless other innovations and designs were made by money. Including but not limited to: Internet, Restaurants (any), Firefighting equipment, better building materials, modern medicine, automobiles, ships, exploration, space travel, aircraft, the train, furniture, many arts, printing press, and the list goes on and on and on. Its not likely someone would have made those without incentive to merely "benefit all the world". People are naturally greedy when they get ideas and make them and the saying is true in this world that economically "Nice guys finish last".

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EVA-251
General


Also Known As: evanb90
Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Location: o kawaii koto

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hey, I scored
Economic Left/Right: 1.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.54

Roughly the same as when I took it last year in PES... I think it would be different, but there is too many in- between issues for me.

Hmm...I am little more authoritarian.

_________________
YR modder/artist, DOOM mapper, aka evanb90
Project Lead Developer, New-Star Strike (2014-)
Former Project Lead Developer Star Strike (2005-2012), Z-Mod (2006-2007), RA1.5 (2008-2013), The Cold War (2006-2007)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Von Kriplespac
General


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

( No longer applies, Kthx. )

_________________
...

Last edited by Von Kriplespac on Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Judeau
Commander


Joined: 28 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

"Not my fault PPM has no right-wing people outside myself and Clazzy just asked for a fight"

asked for a fight, how very stupid of you, you must think that you are completely right, and that you had to teach your obviously superior*PRIDE* way of seeing things to clazzy ?

the people not agreeing with you must always be asking for a fight eh ?


i'd enjoy if you did not turn this into a nationalist issue, if you want to keep claiming that america is great, i'll make sure to teach you otherwise*notice the fact that someguy apparently is proud of where he was born, even though he has had absolutely no hand in it, this is called pride, one of the 7 deadly sins (which the christian inhabitants of course are so quick to warn against , never mind that they are the most sinful ) *

all this bullshit about "life", tell me why that unborn baby is important, why would you force people to have children when they don't want to ?
why should something that has done absolutely NO GOOD be seen as more important than the woman that has done what society asked of her for so long?

tell me , who's cause is it that socialism doesn't work ?
the ones doing their jobs and helping fellow humans, or those firmly convinced that they are the center of the world and that they should live better lives at the cost of others ?

socialism IS a good system, it's the people that screw others over that make it an unpractical system

until people change, the world won't become better, and people like you that aren't willing to help people at the cost of yourself are the main problem.

"Gitmo is different than the US constitution. For one Gitmo is MILITARY and the Constitution applies to CIVILIANS. (albeit it does have some tug on military issues) Combatants captured in the field are not granted civilian rights nor should they be. "

tell me, are kidnapped cvilians combatants ?


i'll make my views real simple
humans are a bunch of clothed animals, we call ourselves important, intelligent, advanced and creative, we aren't anything special until we work together

we're still greedy,even if that harms everyone, we aren't willing to think calmly about problems, we aren't willing to share and most importantly, we aren't willing to learn from errors

people act purely on instinct and emotion?
greed comes from acting illogically*like animals*, in the animal kingdom you protect your own interests, ignoring the fact that working together would greatly benefit everyone

violence comes from acting like animals* ANY problem can be solved by simple discussion, it's simple human pride and foolishness that stops one of the sides of a discussion from admitting they are wrong *

overpopulaton , acting like animals, there's no NEED to have over 2 children, it's simple lust and animal instinct that causes a lot of problems * tied in with violence of course, pack leader behaviour *

pollution ?, acting like animals, taking the easiest most cost-effective way , while ignoring environment* greed *

almost ALL problems come from humans acting without thinking logically

the only way that the world will become a better place is people doing away with their instinct/emotions when thinking about a situation/problem.
people accepting that they aren't unique or special would be a great step forwards as well



let me define TRUE freedom

people keep saying that they have the right to do whatever they want, they often forget that this is WRONG

you may do whatever you want as long as you DO NOT cause harm in any way

if everyone followed the above idea of freedom, it would be another great step forward

Last edited by Judeau on Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:02 pm; edited 2 times in total

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account
Von Kriplespac
General


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Damn straight Judeau.

_________________
...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Judeau wrote:
"Not my fault PPM has no right-wing people outside myself and Clazzy just asked for a fight"

asked for a fight, how very stupid of you, you must think that you are completely right, and that you had to teach your obvisouly superior*PRIDE* way of seeing things to clazzy ?

the people not agreeing with you must always be asking for a fight eh ?


i'd enjoy if you did not turn this into a nationalist issue, if you want to keep claiming that america is great, i'll make sure to teach you otherwise*notice the fact that someguy apparently is proud of where he was born, even though he has had absolutely no hand in it, this is called pride, one of the 7 deadly sins (which the christian inhabitants of course are so quick to warn against , never mind that they are the most sinful ) *


Im trying not to but every one of these types of debates turns into a "youre American so therefore your opinion doesnt count" bullshit like that so I have to be that way. If I agreed with the pack then Ive thrown away my free will.

Quote:

all this bullshit about "life", tell me why that unborn baby is important, why would you force people to have children when they don't want to ?
why should something that has done absolutely NO GOOD be seen as more important than the woman that has done what society asked of her for so long?


The second that egg is fertilized by the sperm its no longer in the control of either the man or the woman. Besides all life is sacred and at the minimum deserves a chance to at least live. Also whats to stop that child from becoming one of the greatest people this Earth has ever had to live? Little to nothing outside an abortion of that potential. Theres a little thing called patience thats apparently in shortage these days due to people saying "I dont HAVE to have kids but if that situation arises I can just abort!"

Quote:

tell me , who's cause is it that socialism doesn't work ?
the ones doing their jobs and helping fellow humans, or those firmly convinced that they are the center of the world and that they should live better lives at the cost of others ?


The cause why it doesnt work is that Socialism is reverse incentive. In short punish success and reward failure or mediocrity.

Quote:

socialism IS a good system, it's the people that screw others over that make it an unpractical system


Dont forget the fact it basically kills all form of competition or incentive or even the will to work knowing that someone out there under that system is livin it up not lifting a finger to help out. its called Welfare Moms and it WAS a problem in this country and apparently still is in others.

Quote:

until people change, the world won't become better, and people like you that aren't willing to help people at the cost of yourself are the main problem.


Ill help people but only if they are willing to help themselves. Not many people stuck in those situations can comprehend that maybe if ya walked away from a bad situation in the first place you already have taken the first step to bettering yourself. Most people under any kind of international/local aid dont seem to know that.

Quote:

"Gitmo is different than the US constitution. For one Gitmo is MILITARY and the Constitution applies to CIVILIANS. (albeit it does have some tug on military issues) Combatants captured in the field are not granted civilian rights nor should they be. "

tell me, are kidnapped cvilians combatants ?


If the civilians had weapons and were aiming them at other people then yes. If they didnt have a weapon and/or were not threatening to harm or not harming people then no.

Quote:

i'll make my views real simple
humans are a bunch of clothed animals, we call ourselves important, intelligent, advanced and creative, we aren't anything special until we work together


What a low opinion you have on humanity. Considering sometimes the single must be able to do something the many cannot or will not do.

Quote:

we're still greedy,even if that harms everyone, we aren't willing to think calmly about problems, we aren't willing to share and most importantly, we aren't willing to learn from errors

people act purely on instinct and emotion?
greed comes from acting illogically*like animals*, in the animal kingdom you protect your own interests, ignoring the fact that working together would greatly benefit everyone


only if there is no consequence of their actions. Also if working together benefits everyone then tell me what do you do to those who merely take the benefits and dont contribute? In capitalistic economies that person fails and goes away, in others that person becomes a leech on the system.

Quote:

violence comes from acting like animals* ANY problem can be solved by simple discussion, it's simple human pride and foolishness that stops one of the sides of a discussion from admitting they are wrong *

overpopulaton , acting like animals, there's no NEED to have over 2 children, it's simple lust and animal instinct that causes a lot of problems * tied in with violence of course, pack leader behaviour *


Humans have always fought each other over something. You cant have even 2 people in the same room without an argument or fight breaking out eventually.

Quote:

pollution ?, acting like animals, taking the easiest most cost-effective way , while ignoring environment* greed *

almost ALL problems come from humans acting without thinking logically

the only way that the world will become a better place is people doing away with their instinct/emotions when thinking about a situation/problem.
people accepting that they aren't unique or special would be a great step forwards as well


Sure and living communally did wonders for peoples life expectancy by using the can like animals and then it went into the water supply.
Also you cant get people to pull a Vulcans situation where they cast their emotions away. Its brought many great things and at the same time many bad things but its HUMAN to have them.


Quote:

let me define TRUE freedom

people keep saying that they have the right to do whatever they want, they often forget that this is WRONG

you may do whatever you want as long as you DO NOT cause harm in any way

if everyone followed the above idea of freedom, it would be another great step forward


Thats exactly how it works here in America. Do the wtf you please until it affects someone else. Then that ends and consequence begins.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Judeau
Commander


Joined: 28 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

SomeGuy[YR:SF] wrote:


Im trying not to but every one of these types of debates turns into a "youre American so therefore your opinion doesnt count" bullshit like that so I have to be that way. If I agreed with the pack then Ive thrown away my free will.



i fully agree with your above statement, however i was merely saying that this was not a discussion about america

Quote:

The second that egg is fertilized by the sperm its no longer in the control of either the man or the woman. Besides all life is sacred and at the minimum deserves a chance to at least live. Also whats to stop that child from becoming one of the greatest people this Earth has ever had to live? Little to nothing outside an abortion of that potential. Theres a little thing called patience thats apparently in shortage these days due to people saying "I dont HAVE to have kids but if that situation arises I can just abort!"


point 1 : the organism feeds on/with the mother*placenta* does it not ?
point 2 : all life is not sacred, if you thought this you would make sure not to harm anything*hey there little ant, let's make sure not to step on you*
point 3 : the "but it could be a great person" argument is greatly flawed, tell me, is it not possible that you are stiffling the growth of the other children or the parents *you can go even further* by having a child that cannot be fully supported ?, what if the mother would have become a great person if they had indeed aborted?

Quote:

The cause why it doesnt work is that Socialism is reverse incentive. In short punish success and reward failure or mediocrity.


you are wrong, this is done by faulty implementation

Quote:

Dont forget the fact it basically kills all form of competition or incentive or even the will to work knowing that someone out there under that system is livin it up not lifting a finger to help out. its called Welfare Moms and it WAS a problem in this country and apparently still is in others.


and these "welfare moms" are one of the problems, as i said previously
and it does not kill all incetives, people should*and are* not only fueled by monetary rewards

Quote:

Ill help people but only if they are willing to help themselves. Not many people stuck in those situations can comprehend that maybe if ya walked away from a bad situation in the first place you already have taken the first step to bettering yourself. Most people under any kind of international/local aid dont seem to know that.

which is why you teach them

Quote:

If the civilians had weapons and were aiming them at other people then yes. If they didnt have a weapon and/or were not threatening to harm or not harming people then no.

fully agreed

Quote:

What a low opinion you have on humanity. Considering sometimes the single must be able to do something the many cannot or will not do.

the single can only go so far, you do need to work together to survive

Quote:

only if there is no consequence of their actions. Also if working together benefits everyone then tell me what do you do to those who merely take the benefits and dont contribute? In capitalistic economies that person fails and goes away, in others that person becomes a leech on the system.

again wrong implementation

Quote:

Humans have always fought each other over something. You cant have even 2 people in the same room without an argument or fight breaking out eventually.

and why should that not change ?

Quote:

Sure and living communally did wonders for peoples life expectancy by using the can like animals and then it went into the water supply.
Also you cant get people to pull a Vulcans situation where they cast their emotions away. Its brought many great things and at the same time many bad things but its HUMAN to have them.

i never said anything about communal living
and it is quite possible to control yourself, you may have emotions, don't act on them

Quote:

Thats exactly how it works here in America. Do the wtf you please until it affects someone else. Then that ends and consequence begins.

but that's not the way it happens, which is the problem

what about all the morality laws ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_law
http://www.dumblaws.com/

_________________
Micro TS
Portable, no campaign, movies or music, just the engine and needed resources for skirmish and lan.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Blue Laws I can understand where they are coming from because they are designed to protect some people from some people. Like in my state we gots Blue Laws saying cant buy cars or alcohol on Sundays. Tis alright as it keeps *most* drunk drivers off the road that day. Of course if ya think of it in use they are kinda silly.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sir Modsalot
Commander


Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Location: Mixing psilocybin in your drinks.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Clazzy wrote:
If modern society collapsed, everybody would be in the same boat and everything could be started again. The core problems with this world nowadays come from one thing and one thing only:
Money.

Think about that for a moment, before money people lived together in communities and shared what they made. Farmers tended to the land, reared animals and fed people, clothmakers made clothes, blacksmiths would make tools for the other trades, miners would get coal, lumberjacks wood and so on and soforth. The group had to work together and a loss of an individual was a loss to everybody. When money came along, people then worked for their own gain to get as much money as possible. People stop caring about other people when they get wealth, simply put. Unfortunately, we can't just abolish money, but helping our fellow man is a good start to a fairer and better society.


That's the most intelligent thing I've seen anyone say here in the short year or so I've been here.

And uh... I took that test last month and forgot my results... need to retake; I think I was on the left side.#Tongue

_________________


[quote="DCoder"]There is no sanity left in this thread.[/quote]

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Skype Account AIM Address
Clazzy
Karma Police


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Location: Algae Colony On Mars

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Quote:
Gitmo is different than the US constitution. For one Gitmo is MILITARY and the Constitution applies to CIVILIANS. (albeit it does have some tug on military issues) Combatants captured in the field are not granted civilian rights nor should they be.

So that makes everything all fine and dandy? They're still entitled to a fair trial, something the US hasn't granted them for four years.

Quote:
Pay attention to whats happening over there. Has Africa actually improved in the last 20 years? If anything its gotten worse! Darfur for example NOBODY is even trying to escape the genocide. Not because they cant, but because they want someone to save them from it for them. Just like Katrina where nobody in the SuperDome was willing to simply walk out of the city and was waiting for someone to rescue them the people in Darfur and all of Africa are the same way. You cant help he who wont help himself. Tis a waste.

Two words: corrupt dictators. Countries with leaders who care about their people (e.g. Libya) have seen an increase in the quality of life over the years, compared with others. It's not that the people don't want to do anything, it's that they can't because of their interfering government.

Quote:
So it was a generalization but do you really think outside the UK, Europe has superior economy than anywhere in the world? Statistics say no.

Countries that joined the Euro had a drop in their economy, I won't deny that. The UK didn't join the Euro, you'll find.

Quote:
Calling us Americans stingy? Look whos been listening to Annan too much. By all statistics the United States donated THE most gross money to the relief effort and even sent soldiers to help people and evacuate injured in the 2004 Tsunami. Linky below that shows the US donated THE MOST.

Oh, well done. Have a medal. You claim to be the richest, most powerful country in the world yet you only donated a significant amount of money after it emerged that Canada had donated almost twice as much as you originally did. Considering your country's constant rivalry with Canada, you didn't want to be beaten.

Quote:
Communal living may have been there in the early days but you are forgetting one key thing. Standard of living. They had to do so since farming techniques and means of survival were so rudimentary that one-man subsistance was near impossible. Whereas money and modern economy created exponential quantities of food that primitive societies couldonly dream about, technology to create that, countless other innovations and designs were made by money. Including but not limited to: Internet, Restaurants (any), Firefighting equipment, better building materials, modern medicine, automobiles, ships, exploration, space travel, aircraft, the train, furniture, many arts, printing press, and the list goes on and on and on. Its not likely someone would have made those without incentive to merely "benefit all the world". People are naturally greedy when they get ideas and make them and the saying is true in this world that economically "Nice guys finish last".

Firstly, let's not misuse the word exponential. Secondly, how on Earth would money allow for these things? Nobody profited from inventing the wheel, dagger, pickaxe and other tools. The internet was never a commercial venture as well. People think money is vital because we've had it for so long. And what's wrong with helping your fellow man? Years of social development was a good thing, not something to be thrown away so easily.

Quote:
The second that egg is fertilized by the sperm its no longer in the control of either the man or the woman. Besides all life is sacred and at the minimum deserves a chance to at least live. Also whats to stop that child from becoming one of the greatest people this Earth has ever had to live? Little to nothing outside an abortion of that potential. Theres a little thing called patience thats apparently in shortage these days due to people saying "I dont HAVE to have kids but if that situation arises I can just abort!"

The egg still relies on the mother. The mother still has control over it. Here's a question, do you think a woman who s pregnant from a rape should be allowed to abort the child?

Quote:
The cause why it doesnt work is that Socialism is reverse incentive. In short punish success and reward failure or mediocrity.

It rewards teamwork and punishes being unproductive. Success and failure are different things under a socialist banner because it has different goals.

Quote:
Humans have always fought each other over something. You cant have even 2 people in the same room without an argument or fight breaking out eventually.

Duh. The case is the same with animals, what's your point?

Quote:
Also you cant get people to pull a Vulcans situation where they cast their emotions away. Its brought many great things and at the same time many bad things but its HUMAN to have them.

Oh yes, let's use a FICTIONAL race of ALIENS as a basis for an argument. Oh joy!

Quote:
Thats exactly how it works here in America. Do the wtf you please until it affects someone else. Then that ends and consequence begins.

The USA arrests and imprisons people for thoughtcrime. A group of people had an idea to blow up a building in Chicago yet had no money, no weapons, no explosives, no plan and no means to do it. The US government obtained this information through a tap on the phone lines and then proceeded to arrest and charge them with conspiracy to cause an explosion (or whatever). People are arrested for KNOWING known terrorists or being suspected of one and some were placed in Guantanamo. Freedom of speech breaks down in situations like this, don't you think?

_________________
Quote:
This is sexier than what this forum was supposed to tolerate. - Banshee

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Pokey
Energy Commando


Joined: 29 May 2005
Location: England

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Clazzy wrote:

Oh yes, let's use a FICTIONAL race of ALIENS as a basis for an argument. Oh joy!


Owned XD

_________________


Organised Rules.ini by Judeau

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Like hell theyre entitled to a trial. Theyre flippin lucky they are still alive! if I was in command there Id say blast all prisoners in the field if they still have weapons. Nothing in the Geneva Conventions says an army cannot eradicate an enemy army to the last man if they arent POWs.

And the people need to be held accountable for their governments. They are just as much at fault as the dictators.

I recanted that part about UK but Europe is still in that boat.

Right and initially we still donated the most. Then Annan called us "stingy" and then the anger was on.

They may not have been ventures but they earned money from it or several of them benefitted by having money invested in them.

No in all cases where its not medically necessary. Think for a second would the unborn child say "please kill me because according to your morals of which I may not agree with I have no right to exist." or would that child protest were it able to communicate at a reasoning level?

Then explain why that system fails on those who have ideas that outside that world would make them wealthy? According to that system, Sir Richard Branson never should have come about and he never technically graduated High School and hes one of the richest sumnabitches on this planet all because he had an idea and built upon it.

The point is you cannot expect everything to go to this Utopian peacenik society where war is only listed in books from aeons past. Human nature just does not head in that direction regardless of how many good intentions have tried to steer humanity that way.

And the point mentioned was to stop using human emotions as a basis for anything. Humans are not some automaton that reacts in a cold manner. They have always relied on their emotions and nothing short of the worst kind of living imagineable would make people change.

Sources please on that or you are just making shit up. The last time "thoughtcrime" happened was the Sedition Act of 1798 and it was challenged, thrown out and reparations were made to all those affected.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clazzy
Karma Police


Joined: 26 Nov 2002
Location: Algae Colony On Mars

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Quote:
Like hell theyre entitled to a trial. Theyre flippin lucky they are still alive! if I was in command there Id say blast all prisoners in the field if they still have weapons. Nothing in the Geneva Conventions says an army cannot eradicate an enemy army to the last man if they arent POWs.

Well aren't we lucky you're not calling the shots in the Oval Office, eh? Taking prisoners of war is actually only allowed when they are fighting with a recognised uniform for a nation state of some form. Terrorists and suspected terrorists are not legal combatants and should not be treated as such.

Quote:

Then explain why that system fails on those who have ideas that outside that world would make them wealthy? According to that system, Sir Richard Branson never should have come about and he never technically graduated High School and hes one of the richest sumnabitches on this planet all because he had an idea and built upon it.

Living in a left-wing society doesn't inhibit your ability to make an idea. There were famous Soviet scientists and inventions to come out of communist Russia too.

Quote:
Sources please on that or you are just making shit up. The last time "thoughtcrime" happened was the Sedition Act of 1798 and it was challenged, thrown out and reparations were made to all those affected.

I got the story slightly wrong, but here you go.

_________________
Quote:
This is sexier than what this forum was supposed to tolerate. - Banshee

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
friday-13th
Commander


Joined: 08 Aug 2005
Location: Toronto Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread


_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Skype Account Yahoo Messenger Account
cdmt
Cyborg Engineer


Joined: 25 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.87

Abortion hurts women it doesn't empower them. Abortion causes: an increased risk of breast, ovarian and cervical cancer, an increased incidence of severe depression, potential damage to the cervix which can lead to miscarriage of other babies, increased risk of ectopic pregnancy, risk of being unable bear children again due to scarring, and severe abdominal pain.

If you are raped it would still be better emotionally and physically to have the child and then give the child up for adoption. Abortion disrupts a natural process of the body in a way that is very violent to the women's body emotionally and physically. Rape is horrible enough. Why intensify her pain more through abortion? Why do people think that just because you get rid of the baby the pain goes away and everything is peachy? I knew someone who had an abortion. I had pleaded with her, not to have the abortion. She is agnostic though and didn't think that abortion was wrong and saw it as being a very positive choice. After she got the abortion I didn't hear from her for a few weeks. Then I got a call at 2am she told me that she was going to commit suicide because of her abortion. It affected her that much. She also started sleeping around a lot with whomever because her self esteem had plummeted. I have had to console her often. Don't give me any bull about how great abortion is for women.

Here are a few sites that describe women's experiences with abortion and health risks associated with abortion.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1421119/posts

http://www.geocities.com/kekogut/abortion/Abhurts2.pdf

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Titan
Cyborg Commando


Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

True, but I can imagine it being hard for women to bear the child of the person that raped you. It's a very difficult choice that also brings depression, apart from the consequences that also involve depression.

I'm not sure what to think of it.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Suiseiseki
Commander


Joined: 06 Oct 2003

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

cdmt wrote:
Abortion hurts women it doesn't empower them. Abortion causes: an increased risk of breast, ovarian and cervical cancer, an increased incidence of severe depression, potential damage to the cervix which can lead to miscarriage of other babies, increased risk of ectopic pregnancy, risk of being unable bear children again due to scarring, and severe abdominal pain.


Surely normal methods of giving birth can also have the same risks? Everything causes cancer it'd seem anyway.

Quote:
If you are raped it would still be better emotionally and physically to have the child and then give the child up for adoption. Abortion disrupts a natural process of the body in a way that is very violent to the women's body emotionally and physically. Rape is horrible enough. Why intensify her pain more through abortion.



So you're saying if you are raped - you should keep the child you have a high chance of seeing as another punishment after the original rape trauma? That they should keep the child and go through the pain of child birth for a child they never wanted and possibly could despise having as a part of them?
And the 'disrupting natural processes' could be applies to nigh on any birth control. Condoms aren't natural, neither are any of the pills you can have as alternatives etc. so I class that as an invalid point.

Quote:
Why do people think that just because you get rid of the baby the pain goes away and everything is peachy? I knew someone who had an abortion. I had pleaded with her, not to have the abortion. She is agnostic though anddidn't think that abortion was wrong and saw it as being a very positive choice. After she got the abortion she became very depressed and told me that she was going to commit suicide because of her abortion. It affected her that much. She also started sleeping around a lot with whomever because her self esteem had plummeted. I have had to console her often. Don't give me any bull about how great abortion is for women.


Wow one person became depressed because of a choice they made - that has never happened before and quite obviously solely happens with abortion! There are hundreds of things which could cause the same affect - you can't say she wouldn't have developed post natal depression or any number of other adverse things that can come with pregnancy. She made her choice and regretted it and as such became depressed. That happens all the time and isn't solely something to do with abortion and it's quite possible someone who had an abortion could go onto be very happy.

I didn't check the links as I expect them to be biased in one way or another - especially when posted at the end of an anti-abortion post.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Carnivean, what about the child? The victim may not want the child but does that mean the child does not want to live? There are methods of avoiding parenting other than abortion. Ever heard of a little thing called Adoption? Trading one life for maintaining a lifestyle a good choice does not make.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cdmt
Cyborg Engineer


Joined: 25 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Quote:
That happens all the time and isn't solely something to do with abortion and it's quite possible someone who had an abortion could go onto be very happy.



If abortion is such a great thing why don't we hear about how happy it makes women? Of course there are women who have post natal depression, but there are more women who are depressed after abortion than after pregnancy. But where are the reports of women who are happy because of their abortions? If abortion is great then why is it done in the US in poorly run, unsanitary clinics that care more about making money than caring for women?

Quote:
Surely normal methods of giving birth can also have the same risks? Everything causes cancer it'd seem anyway.


Apparently the site I got that information was wrong. At the present time it is inconclusive apparently. I went to www.cancer.org this time and I found out that there was contradictory evidence. However the other effects are still valid.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IVI
Commander


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Location: Feilubin

PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Abortion eh? personally, I'm against it; but Carnivean has a point in saying that women who opt to bear the child will certainly never forget their misfortune seeing that child whose father they never wanted.?Neutral

It all boils down to the woman making the decision I guess. But then again it begs the question wether abortion will be legalised or not. There will always be people who will be against it and people who will argue about the woman's choice. Neutral

If you ask me, this part of the debate about abortion will prove to be inconclusive sooner or later... just as it has in many other debates I've seen and heard #Tongue. A debate on abortion cannot be resolved IMHO #Tongue

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cdmt
Cyborg Engineer


Joined: 25 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Quote:
If you ask me, this part of the debate about abortion will prove to be inconclusive sooner or later... just as it has in many other debates I've seen and heard . A debate on abortion cannot be resolved IMHO


Agreed, because it is a debate that people believe very strongly about.

I would much rather talk about how much fun it was to visit Angeles City in the Philipines or the Blue Lagoon in Iceland. Smile

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Team SomeGuy
General


Joined: 18 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Nobody seems to be knowing of the Child in this instance. Choice advocates aside, would you ever hear what the child has to say? For all intensive purposes the right of the child to live even if its not with that parent(s) overrides the choice of the woman since the child is another person. It would be the same logic by saying I want you dead because its my choice.

Little difference.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clarkson
General


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Location: DAS BOOT IM DER OSTSEE

PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

breif here, im in school. Minors dont have any rights legally untill they are 18 or 21 in the United States. Schools can legally seach your lockers,ect, without consent, as consent is not required by the minor. Same thing applies here, no? Its a minor by the law. Parent is incharge of what happens with the minor after birth, why not during pregnancy?

_________________
PPM's Reichstrollfuherer, 236th Trollenparties brigade.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Skype Account AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 [73 Posts] Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Mark the topic unread ::  View previous topic :: View next topic
 
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on DiggShare on RedditShare on PInterestShare on Del.icio.usShare on Stumble Upon
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

[ Time: 0.2688s ][ Queries: 11 (0.0113s) ][ Debug on ]