I didn't know you can improve the AI, I just "Added Skirmish Players". As for detail, what do you want? A few trees, a rock, and maybe some rubble? When I make a map I try to focus more on gameplay than on aestetics.
This map for instance, each player has his own plateau, and three enterances. It's Pretty easy to defend early on, as each enterance is a slope up to a cliff, and almost a choke point. In each valley, there is a tib feild, a tib spike, and a few patches of blue. Close enough that you don't really need to expand if you don't want to, but with enough room if you do. The middle has a large amount of tiberium, with two ...craters? It is easily accessed and mined by all four posistions, although controlling this is not absolute to winning. Each player's platue is distanced far enough so that low teir units won't be shoot across, while the higher their artillery units will be able to do some b2b.
So layout wise this map is going to change (not to mention it is based off of a ra2 map, which has exactly the same design). Adding aestetic value to the map is arbitrary imo, I mean, I find it pointless, but if it pleases the masses I guess I can do it. And how do I make the AI harder (other than choosing brutal instead of easy)? _________________ Please, read the signature rules of the forum. QUICK_EDIT
Joined: 18 Jun 2005 Location: Dordrecht, the Netherlands
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject:
From what I see, it's a tiny map... I know the original ain't that big neither, but TW requires much more space then a RA2 map. I suggest making the map about 25% bigger QUICK_EDIT
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
KW Dry Heat (2-4)
