Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:19 pm Post subject:
Weird ...
Subject description: or what ?
so, i got over the adding infantry thing, thinking of it now, it's kinda easy BUT when i wanted to add the battle bunker from Y'sR to Ra2 the weirdest thing happened.
nabnkr.shp, nabnkrmk.shp and bnkr.icon are in my ecache13.mix, copy+pasted the art section, nabnkr is in the Building types and it has the nabnkr section but when in game, i build it, i place it on the battle field, and it automaticly becomes neutral and the ai sells it. Here's the art section and nabnkr section ...
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Location: Iszkaszentgyorgy, Hungary
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:25 pm Post subject:
It's RA2, duh.
In RA2, you can't own a building if the building is garrisonable. You can only prevent selling it with removing the buildup. _________________ "If you didn't get angry and mad and frustrated, that means you don't care about the end result, and are doing something wrong." - Greg Kroah-Hartman
=======================
Past C&C projects: Attacque Supérior (2010-2019); Valiant Shades (2019-2021)
=======================
WeiDU mods: Random Graion Tweaks | Graion's Soundsets
Maintainance: Extra Expanded Enhanced Encounters! | BGEESpawn
Contributions: EE Fixpack | Enhanced Edition Trilogy | DSotSC (Trilogy) | UB_IWD | SotSC & a lot more... QUICK_EDIT
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:28 pm Post subject:
Battle Bunker
you cant use it in RA2. go to this topic and look for the DL of mine AI.RAR
http://www.ppmsite.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=354439#354439 _________________ I am authorized to send out the TMP Studio, PM ME IF YOU WANT IT And check this out, these were sent to me for help with terrain and zdata help along with TMP Studio/Builder
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:31 pm Post subject:
Weird
Site won't allow me to do full edit so I had to make a 2nd post
from that file I uploaded.
Quote:
59,n = Attack Structure At Waypoint (Yuri's Revenge only)
Members of this TaskForce attack the structure at the Waypoint= specified by the second parameter. This action is very similar to action number 43 although this action does not test for ownership of the structure itself - thus the inclusion of this action allows, for example, InfantryTypes with Engineer=yes set to enter structures owned by the same side for the purposes of repair. This would be the most appropriate action to use to get the AI to repair bridges. Use of this also means that the TaskForce will attack the structure with one of its weapons meaning, for example, that units with C4=yes set will not C4 the building but shoot at it instead. This is useful if you want to get a TaskForce to destroy a nearby occupiable structure instead of entering it in a bid to prevent the enemy getting old of it - a tactic used in the Yuri's Revenge AI.
60,0 = Enter Grinder (Yuri's Revenge only)
Members of this TaskForce will enter the nearest structure with Grinding=yes set if it is owned by the owner of the TaskForce or any of its allies.
61,0 = Occupy Tank Bunker (Yuri's Revenge only)
Any VehicleType members of this TaskForce which do not have Bunkerable=no set will enter the nearest vacant structure with Bunker=yes set if it is owned by the owner of the TaskForce or any of its allies.
62,0 = Enter Bio Reactor (Yuri's Revenge only)
Any InfantryType members of this TaskForce will enter the nearest structure with InfantryAbsorb=yes set if it is owned by the owner of the TaskForce or any of its allies and has space available.
63,0 = Occupy Battle Bunker (Yuri's Revenge only)
Any InfantryType members of this TaskForce with Occupier=yes set will enter the nearest structure (which they own) with CanOccupyFire=yes set.
64,0 = Garrison Structure (Yuri's Revenge only)
Any InfantryType members of this TaskForce with Occupier=yes set will enter the nearest (neutral) structure with CanOccupyFire=yes set. This action is used specifically for this purpose due to action #59 (see above) since the logic in Yuri's Revenge has changed so that the units weapon is transferred to the structure. Use of this action also allows the computer to repair those structures by sending an InfantryType with Engineer=yes set into them and also allows the AI to differentiate between attacking such a structure and entering it, which is useful if you want the AI to use infantry to destroy an occupiable structure thus preventing its enemy from using it.
_________________ I am authorized to send out the TMP Studio, PM ME IF YOU WANT IT And check this out, these were sent to me for help with terrain and zdata help along with TMP Studio/Builder
give me a break,Graion. Yesterday i just found out how to move infantry fron Y'sR to Ra2, ok ? ... i ain't no freakin' expert at this s#!t ... but you were right, i removed the buildup and it works, thanx ... and does anyone have a cameo for the robot tank, i kinda ... missplaced mine QUICK_EDIT
yeah, i know, but i didn't thought a garissonable building is not actually buildable ... and thanx for the cameo, it works fine (like something could go wrong) QUICK_EDIT
In General, All Civilian buildings are pretty much unbuildable. If you notice, most if not all have TechLevel=-1 and no Ownership, and placed on map via map editor only. _________________
The enemy shall be injected with toxic poison - Venom QUICK_EDIT
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:21 am Post subject:
techlevel
http://modenc.renegadeprojects.com/TechLevel _________________ I am authorized to send out the TMP Studio, PM ME IF YOU WANT IT And check this out, these were sent to me for help with terrain and zdata help along with TMP Studio/Builder
I really don't get what is the purpose porting YR stuff to plain RA2 since most will NOT WORK since YR added lots of new logic for new things! Why don't you just mod YR?
and yes there is no robot tank logic in plain RA2 either if you want control center... QUICK_EDIT
I really don't get what is the purpose porting YR stuff to plain RA2 since most will NOT WORK since YR added lots of new logic for new things! Why don't you just mod YR?
and yes there is no robot tank logic in plain RA2 either if you want control center...
1. as i said previous, a few days ago i just managed to add infantry to ra2 so you can imagine the experience i have with modding.
2. for now, i'm just gonna learn how to properly tweak the rulesmd.ini and maybe after i master this somewhat difficult art i'll try modding Y'sR
3. no, i didn't used the control center.
4(and most important). i just wanted to add a couple of things to play the Ra2 campaign ... i like it more than the campaign in Y'sR QUICK_EDIT
In General, All Civilian buildings are pretty much unbuildable. If you notice, most if not all have TechLevel=-1 and no Ownership, and placed on map via map editor only.
yeah, but even with TechLevel=(above -1) and Owner=(soviets/allies/both) they are still not buildable and since i didn't know that garissonable buildings are not buildable it seemed weird to me ... QUICK_EDIT
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Location: Iszkaszentgyorgy, Hungary
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:41 am Post subject:
Chriss Rock wrote:
give me a break,Graion. Yesterday i just found out how to move infantry fron Y'sR to Ra2, ok ? ... i ain't no freakin' expert at this s#!t ... but you were right, i removed the buildup and it works, thanx ... and does anyone have a cameo for the robot tank, i kinda ... missplaced mine
I give. But I also agree with Apollo, man, YR and RA2 doesn't have that much difference in INI level.
give me a break,Graion. Yesterday i just found out how to move infantry fron Y'sR to Ra2, ok ? ... i ain't no freakin' expert at this s#!t ... but you were right, i removed the buildup and it works, thanx ... and does anyone have a cameo for the robot tank, i kinda ... missplaced mine
I give. But I also agree with Apollo, man, YR and RA2 doesn't have that much difference in INI level.
Modding YR is more fun.
i partly agree. i've had my share of tweaking the rulesmd.ini but atm i'm using apocalypse mod and if this mod would be a woman, i could say i love her so maybe later, when i'll get bored of it and try to make my own one ... i doubt this will happen soon, since i've been playing this mod for almost 3 years and i still enjoy playing it :d QUICK_EDIT
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Location: Iszkaszentgyorgy, Hungary
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:16 pm Post subject:
Hell, if that would be the reason, I'd never pick up modding. I already have over 100 mods on my HDD.
You hould copy out Apoc's files when you try your and back. _________________ "If you didn't get angry and mad and frustrated, that means you don't care about the end result, and are doing something wrong." - Greg Kroah-Hartman
=======================
Past C&C projects: Attacque Supérior (2010-2019); Valiant Shades (2019-2021)
=======================
WeiDU mods: Random Graion Tweaks | Graion's Soundsets
Maintainance: Extra Expanded Enhanced Encounters! | BGEESpawn
Contributions: EE Fixpack | Enhanced Edition Trilogy | DSotSC (Trilogy) | UB_IWD | SotSC & a lot more... QUICK_EDIT
nah ... as i said, not right now, first i wanna learn how to add/remove/edit things in Ra2 (which i consider to be simpler) and after that i'll start modding Y'sR ... i would probably f#ck up Y'sR, and besides, i'm not using any mod for Ra2 even if i tryied a lot of mods there was none i liked so i decided to make my own mod, just the way i like it
off-topic: there's a mod for Ra2 or Y'sR, i can't remember it's name but i remember it having the Ghost from StarCraft. Any idea where i could find the files for that unit ? ... i already searched on google for SC units converted to Ra2, but all sites with downloadable things (probably what i was looking for) were down/doesn't exist any more/never existed ... QUICK_EDIT
could you be referring to star strike? what kind of unit was it? transport? tank? plane? _________________ I am authorized to send out the TMP Studio, PM ME IF YOU WANT IT And check this out, these were sent to me for help with terrain and zdata help along with TMP Studio/Builder
ok, they are infantry. I goggled it and got lot of hits, but nothing of notice. ill dig through stuff I have down loaded over the years. _________________ I am authorized to send out the TMP Studio, PM ME IF YOU WANT IT And check this out, these were sent to me for help with terrain and zdata help along with TMP Studio/Builder
if this mod would be a woman, i could say i love her
You need to get out more, or try more mods.
even though i'm on this page for like 20 minutes bearly now i read you post. and hey, i ain't the "i love games, and only games. and i don't need girls" type of guy, i have realationships, with females, homo sapiens sapiens females, you know ... QUICK_EDIT
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Location: Iszkaszentgyorgy, Hungary
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:49 am Post subject:
Hello, me neither. Me never liked StarCraft, me tried StarCraft only once in 2004 and me favors War3TFT. _________________ "If you didn't get angry and mad and frustrated, that means you don't care about the end result, and are doing something wrong." - Greg Kroah-Hartman
=======================
Past C&C projects: Attacque Supérior (2010-2019); Valiant Shades (2019-2021)
=======================
WeiDU mods: Random Graion Tweaks | Graion's Soundsets
Maintainance: Extra Expanded Enhanced Encounters! | BGEESpawn
Contributions: EE Fixpack | Enhanced Edition Trilogy | DSotSC (Trilogy) | UB_IWD | SotSC & a lot more... QUICK_EDIT
Joined: 15 Jun 2011 Location: "Where do you want setup?".
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:25 pm Post subject:
I say just use the ghost from TS, it looks very close to that thing... err, what do you call it?, I don't play kids-only games like Star craft. _________________ Also known as superluigi949 and SuperMario949.
Banned for pretending to be someone else. QUICK_EDIT
Yeah, guess what. The average human being has a terrible taste in films, music, books and videogames.
Just look at Transformers, Miley Cyrus, Harry Potter and StarCraft.
Shit for the masses. It has no soul. It's all polished, designed, patched and balanced to be attractive to the biggest group of tools thrown together.
[/offtopic] QUICK_EDIT
Now, if you say C&C is superior to StarCraft manyfolds, sure, and I would concur, but you can't say it's a shitty game, because it's not. Really, if a game is shitty, people would know; I've played StarCraft, and enjoyed it. A similar person may indulge in StarCraft and completely hate C&C, even though C&C is a perfectly good series, and you can't call it shitty. QUICK_EDIT
different ppl, different tastes ...
i loke both sc and c&c, each has it's own strong points and weak points ... and that's all i'm gonna say. now i'd better close this page before some c&c fanatic starts throwing stones at me via email QUICK_EDIT
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
Weird ...
... and does anyone have a cameo for the robot tank, i kinda ... missplaced mine 
...
...
